British Prime Minister May explains Brexit expectations in Florence speech

No10 Twitter

Theresa May presenting her vision in Florence

ALTHOUGH, as with so many political speeches, much of the content had already been leaked, Theresa May confirmed that she hopes to obtain a two year extension.

She explained in a 45 minute speech that although Britain would leave the European Union in March 2019, she wanted to have time for the actual ‘divorce’ to go smoothly and therefore hoped to have this two year extension when Britain would honour all of the commitments that it does now.

If agreed, this would mean that there would be free movement of EU nationals without restriction and continued payment to the EU of at least €20 billion to ensure that no country is made to spend more money than committed in the EU budget.

This concession may be very attractive to the Union, as Britain’s departure in 2019 would have left a large gap in the 2020 budget which had been approved and would mean greater contributions from the remaining 27 states.

It was hinted at, but left unsaid, that Britain could contribute even more to the EU budget if negotiations proceed in a smooth and timely manner.

She confirmed the importance of working closely with the rest of the EU in the area of security and wants to see a new treaty put in place in order to maintain the rule of law and fight terrorism.

Once again, she also confirmed her government’s intention to make passage between Northern Ireland and the Republic as smooth as possible and added that Brexit legislation would take into account rulings of the European Court of Justice especially in the case of disputes between the UK and EU nationals.

The EU lead politician in the Brexit negotiations Michel Barnier gave the speech a cautious welcome, describing it as “constructive”, Boris Johnson welcomed it but those hard-line Brexiteers were not so happy, with Nigel Farage describing the speech as “two fingers up to the Brexit voters”.

Just prior to the speech, one of the three main credit rating groups downgraded Britain from an  Aa1 to an Aa2 rating, blaming Brexit and the amount of government time that will be spent dealing with it rather than on looking after the economy.

Neither this downgrading nor the content of the speech hurt the pound to euro exchange rate which is still stronger than it was just two weeks ago.

Written by

John Smith

Married to Ophelia in Gibraltar in 1978, John has spent much of his life travelling on security print and minting business and visited every continent except Antarctica. Having retired several years ago, the couple moved to their house in Estepona and John became a regular news writer for the EWN Media Group taking particular interest in Finance, Gibraltar and Costa del Sol Social Scene. Currently he is acting as Editorial Consultant for the paper helping to shape its future development. Share your story with us by emailing, by calling +34 951 38 61 61 or by messaging our Facebook page


    • Drew Edgar

      23 September 2017 • 21:30

      “No speech is better than a bad speech”

      Surely the 2 years from triggering Article 50 IS the “transition period”?

    • Drew Edgar

      23 September 2017 • 21:31

      If majority of our trade presently operates on WTO tariffs what’s the UK’s practical ”difficulty” with EU trade being handled the same way?

      Any potential ”disincentive” from application of 2% WTO on exports to EU has surely been offset by depreciation/regularisation of £ exchange rate?

      As UK operates a substantial trade deficit with EU surely application WTO tariffs will have a net beneficial effect on HM Treasury receipts?

    • Drew Edgar

      23 September 2017 • 21:36

      Citizens “rights/privileges” and of course OBLIGATIONS are precisely those, attributable to Citizens NOT non-citizens.

      If you wish to enjoy them, apply for citizenship & swear loyalty to Queen and Country. Otherwise apply for “indefinite leave to remain”.

    Comments are closed.