New Queen Elizabeth II statue sparks debate « Euro Weekly News

New Queen Elizabeth II statue sparks debate

The Queen Elizabeth II statue - Euro Weekly News

Credit: X

A newly unveiled bronze statue of the late Queen Elizabeth II in Northern Ireland is making headlines.

The statue, created by Belfast-based artist Anto Brennan, stands proudly in Antrim Castle Gardens, featuring the Queen alongside her husband, Prince Philip, and their beloved corgis. While some admire the sculpture’s placement and craftsmanship, others – particularly on social media – have voiced sharp criticisms about its likeness to Her Majesty.

The Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council, responsible for commissioning the artwork, described the statue in a Facebook post as a tribute to Queen Elizabeth II’s “grace, steadfastness, and lifelong dedication to public service.”

Yet, for some, the statue doesn’t live up to that sentiment.

The Queen Elizabeth II statue: Art or affront?

Many are divided on whether the bronze creation truly honours Queen Elizabeth II. Some took to social media, with comments ranging from “insulting” to “absolutely horrendous.” One commenter went as far as comparing the statue to the fictional film character Mrs. Doubtfire.

Richard Morris, an art historian, added fuel to the fire, criticising not only this statue but British public art in general: “Britain is full of bad public art… This is a case in point.” His remarks on X echoed the opinions of many who felt the sculpture missed the mark.

On the other hand, some voices offered a more measured response. One defender on social media reminded critics of the time and effort that go into such works, stating, “Such a shame people can only find fault but don’t think about the effort put into making them.”

In response to the backlash, Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council stood by their decision to commission the piece, explaining that the majority of people who have seen the sculpture in person have reacted positively. In a statement to Sky News, the council acknowledged the mixed reactions but emphasised the statue’s role as a “lasting tribute” to the Queen’s legacy.

Whether viewed as a tribute or a missed opportunity, this statue has undoubtedly succeeded in one thing: keeping the conversation around Queen Elizabeth II’s legacy alive.

What do you think? Does the statue capture the late Queen’s essence, or does it fall short? Let us know in the comments below.

Author badge placeholder
Written by

Letara Draghia

Part-time writer, wife, and mother from the UK. Living an enjoyable life in southern Spain.

Comments


    • John McLean

      12 September 2024 • 08:15

      It looks nothing like her, neither does the statue of Phillip look like him

    • Frances Spicer

      12 September 2024 • 09:15

      It doesn’t look much like either of them but must be difficult to get good likenesses in statues? I thought it was a shame they thought she were wearing a headscarf. I suppose if she was out walking the dogs she would’ve done.

    • Mary

      12 September 2024 • 10:28

      Way of the mark. Not a true likness in any way.

    • Anne Sewell

      12 September 2024 • 12:50

      Mrs Doubtfire comparison is valid! Looks nothing like the Queen.

    • Anne Sewell

      12 September 2024 • 12:53

      Prince Philip is a bit iffy too.

    Comments are closed.